10 月 16 日的托福考試已經(jīng)結(jié)束,考生們的表現(xiàn)各不相同。此次考試究竟考了哪些內(nèi)容?又有哪些題目成為了考生們的 “攔路虎”?接下來,我們將對 10 月 16 日的托福考試考情進行全面回顧,為大家一一解答這些疑問。
#01 獨立口語思路解析
10月16日托??荚?/strong>
Some students like to review their notes regularly on a daily basis, while others like to review their notes just before the test. Which do you prefer?
答法一:daily review
1、保證復習質(zhì)量:舉例面對較難的知識如“歷史課上大量年份日期/經(jīng)濟”,課上很多概念理論術語,需要提前做好準備,每天鞏固重復記憶,避免遺忘
2、減輕考前壓力:對比考試前往往需要多門科目一起復習,心理負擔重,容易考前焦慮,但如果能每天復習,復習壓力減輕,更加自信穩(wěn)定發(fā)揮
關鍵詞:make sure reviewing quality, repetitively memorize, prepare in advance
Alleviate the pressure, mental burden, stabilize the performance
答法二:just before the test
1、每天更多空余時間:舉例作為高中生,考前每天有很多任務:申請/文書/材料;不用每天復習可以讓自己有時間勞逸結(jié)合,投入自己的愛好,減輕壓力
2、更適合短期記憶的學生:舉例自己比較擅長瞬時記憶,復習背誦特定歷史年份時,速記記憶更準確;每天復習反而是機械性記憶
關鍵詞:more time available, hectic lifestyle, balance study and life,Instant memory, specific timeline of historical events, rote memory
#02學術討論寫作思路解析
10月16日托??荚?/strong>
Dr. Achebe
In recent years, the rise of artificial intelligence has introduced Al generators to draft essays and articles. While some people believe this is a valuable tool that can help writers save time and enhance their creativity, others argue that relying on Al undermines the development of writing skills and critical thinking. Do you think Al generators should be restricted? Please explain your reasoning.
Claire:I think Al generators should be restricted, mainly due to the high risk of plagiarism. Since Al doesn't always cite its sources, writers could unintentionally use ideas from others without proper attribution. For example, relying too much on Al could result in students facing academic penalties if their work is flagged for unoriginal content.
Andrew:I believe Al generators should continue to be used because they help writers focus on polishing their work rather than getting stuck on initial drafts. From my experience, Al can highlight mistakes or improve structure. it allows me to spend more time refining their ideas, ultimately producing higher-quality essays.
題目類型:對立題型
贊同立場:Claire 限制AI寫作工具
論述邏輯:借助AI寫作-- 寫作內(nèi)容來源于數(shù)據(jù)庫或者已經(jīng)存在的文章--內(nèi)容不具備個人的經(jīng)驗和個人寫作風格--缺乏獨特性和個性化表達--不利于培養(yǎng)獨立思維
using AI for writing - the content is sourced from databases or pre-existing articles - lack personal experience and individual writing style - short of uniqueness and personalized expression - not conducive to fostering independent thinking.
電話:400-963-5018
地址:上海?黃浦區(qū)漢口路266號申大廈11樓
交通:地鐵2、10號線南京東路站3號口
Copyright ?2023上海瀾大教育信息咨詢有限公司. All Rights Reserved 滬ICP備10035962號-1 滬公網(wǎng)安備31010102007782
Copyright ?2023上海瀾大教育信息咨詢有限公司. All Rights Reserved 滬ICP備10035962號-1 滬公網(wǎng)安備31010102007782